Share this page with your friends:

Print

A Case for Owning Commodities When No One Else Is

May 1, 2013

Sometimes following where money is being invested is a solid course of action to gain alpha; other times, a better opportunity lies in going the opposite direction, i.e., thinking contrarian.

Take commodities, energy and materials, which may be the most unappreciated areas of the market these days. According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Global Fund Manager Survey of 250 participants who collectively manage $725 billion, energy, materials and commodities are extremely underowned.

As you can see below, the global asset class positioning during the first week of April compared to historical data shows that energy positions are close to 3 standard deviations below the long-term average. An allocation to materials is more than 2 standard deviations below its long-term average and commodity exposure is close to 2 standard deviations below its historical measure.

Global Asset Class Positioning Compared to Historical Data
click to enlarge

Take note of the timing, though, as it appears that it may make sense to own the most underowned areas of the market. Compare today’s portfolio weightings to the last time fund managers had such a significant underweight in these asset classes. Each bar below indicates whether allocations in energy represented a net overweight or underweight position. Most of the time since 2003, managers maintained an overweight allocation, which means they likely anticipated outperformance in energy companies during this period of time.

However, the last time they had such a big underweight in global energy for this long was at the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009.

Survey of Fund Managers Allocation to Global Energy
click to enlarge

In materials, there were many more times that managers chose to have an underweight allocation to the sector. But again, the magnitude of today’s allocation decision matches what we saw in the 2008-2009 timeframe.

Survey of fund managers allocation to global materials
click to enlarge

A similar picture for commodities reveals this consistent trend. Asset allocation indicating an overweighting in commodities hasn’t been this negative since 2008-2009.

Net overweight allocation to commodities
click to enlarge

Given the historical trend in late 2008 and early 2009 when managers were invested in other areas of the market, many likely missed the huge rally in natural resources stocks. From the market bottom on March 9, 2009, the Morgan Stanley Commodity Related Equity Index of commodity stocks grew 156 percent on a cumulative basis over the next two years. This is more than twice the return of the commodities futures index, the Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index.

Community stocks rose an astounding 156 percent following the March 2009 boom
click to enlarge

Don’t miss the next potential rally. In one investment, the Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) gives you exposure to all three of these underowned segments of the market. It’s a multi-faceted approach to energy and materials stocks across 10 distinct industries to aim for lower volatility and better growth potential.

We believe the commodity supercycle continues, driven by emerging countries experiencing rising urbanization, increasing wealth and healthy GDP growth rates. What’s important for investors to remember is to build a diversified basket of natural resources companies actively managed by professionals who understand the seasonal and cyclical trends of these specialized assets.

Please consider carefully a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. For this and other important information, obtain a fund prospectus by visiting www.usfunds.com or by calling 1-800-US-FUNDS (1-800-873-8637). Read it carefully before investing. Distributed by U.S. Global Brokerage, Inc.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Foreign and emerging market investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and less public disclosure, as well as economic and political risk. Because the Global Resources Fund concentrates its investments in a specific industry, the fund may be subject to greater risks and fluctuations than a portfolio representing a broader range of industries.

The Dow Jones UBS Commodity Index is composed of futures contracts on physical commodities, and includes commodities traded on U.S. exchanges, with the exception of aluminum, nickel and zinc, which trade on the London Metal Exchange (LME). The Morgan Stanley Commodity Related Index (CRX) is an equal-dollar weighted index of 20 stocks involved in commodity related industries such as energy, non-ferrous metals, agriculture, and forest products.  The index was developed with a base value of 200 as of March 15, 1996. Standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion of a set of data from its mean. The more spread apart the data, the higher the deviation. Standard deviation is also known as historical volatility. Diversification does not protect an investor from market risks and does not assure a profit.

Net Asset Value
as of 04/23/2014

Global Resources Fund PSPFX $9.85 0.03 Gold and Precious Metals Fund USERX $6.73 0.14 World Precious Minerals Fund UNWPX $6.43 0.11 China Region Fund USCOX $8.02 -0.03 Emerging Europe Fund EUROX $8.07 -0.06 All American Equity Fund GBTFX $32.19 -0.21 Holmes Macro Trends Fund MEGAX $23.56 -0.18 Near-Term Tax Free Fund NEARX $2.25 No Change U.S. Government Securities Ultra-Short Bond Fund UGSDX $2.00 No Change