- May 14, 2012
- Looking to China to Fire Up Its Economy
Following on the heels of renewed concern over Europe’s debt situation, China released its monthly economic data. Fixed asset investment, industrial production and retail sales all rose in April, yet growth was not as strong as analysts anticipated. “Weak” is the word to describe China’s April figures, says CLSA’s Andy Rothman in his Sinology Report.
While data were lower than expected, they weren’t disastrous, says Andy. According to CEBM Group, slower growth was the government’s intention. China wants the ability to manage a “stable decline” to “promote medium-to-long-term structural reforms” as well as avoid a hard landing, says CEBM.
Because they weren’t devastating results for the country, more fine-tuning, rather than a major stimulus plan, is likely to come from this emerging market if growth continues to stall. “The government should move forward to introduce accommodative policies stabilizing economic growth,” says CEBM.
Easing policy for China is only a matter of willingness. Unlike the developed countries of the West that have overworked their printing presses and are now strapped with a tremendous burden of debt, China is in good shape. According to BCA Research, the country’s overall gross debt is only 42 percent of GDP, significantly lower than all of the G-7 countries which have the most debt of the countries listed below. Of the E-7 countries, only Indonesia and Russia have less government debt compared to GDP.

To offset the country’s liabilities, BCA says China also has “a massive net asset position,” including owning interests in publicly listed firms, large companies and the country’s land mass. According to BCA, if you look at only state-owned enterprises, the net assets are nearly “as large as the total public (local and central combined) debt.” By these stats alone, it appears the emerging country does not have a solvency issue.
However, rather than serious stimulus, CLSA anticipates that China will make a move to ensure its two primary goals are met, which include new loan growth as well as M2-money supply growth of about 14 percent. Andy says, to accomplish these goals, the government will likely boost its spending on infrastructure and low-income housing, ease restrictions on new home purchases by first-time buyers, and offer more credit to the private sector.
Hear Andy Rothman discuss a hard or soft landing China now
We believe government policy is a precursor to change, and when China feels the need to fire up its fiscal or monetary firepower, we believe the flow of money will send Chinese stocks—along with commodities—higher.
CEBM notes an interesting correlation between the A-Share market and economic growth, which points to a possible improvement. The research firm compares today’s economy with what we saw in late 2008. While the data is not as ominous and the government has grown comfortable with slower growth today, there is still a resemblance to the situation in 2008, where the market rebound led improved economic growth by four months. CEBM believes it may be seeing the same signs of bottoming of the market today, and if the 2008 trend holds, economic growth should now be in the bottoming process.

Fine-Tuning Your Portfolio to Potentially Benefit
As economic data is released over the next few months, China will be keeping a close eye to determine when to open the spigots. Before this happens, we believe investors should position their portfolios to potentially benefit. Here are two ways:1. Invest in emerging markets companies and commodity equities. Emerging markets continue to offer the most potential for growth, and as you see below, over the past five years, as the Shanghai Composite Index rose, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index soon followed.

2. Get “paid to wait” with dividends. This week, investors fled any asset that was perceived as risky, including stocks of any country and commodities, including gold, in favor of “safe” government Treasuries. The 10-year note on U.S. Treasuries fell to 1.85 percent, which is lower than the dividend yield on numerous stocks. Currently, the annualized dividend rates on the S&P Global Natural Resources, MSCI Emerging Markets and the S&P 500 indices are nearly 2.9 percent, 2.8 percent, and 2.1 percent, respectively, all higher than a 10-year investment. Along with steady income provided by dividends, these stocks offer potential appreciation on your capital.This week, I’ll be presenting at the Hard Assets Conference in New York, sharing more investing insights about China, commodities and how to apply Super S-Curves in a portfolio. I’ll be in good company, as Pam Aden, Adrian Day, Ian McAvity, Jay Taylor and Gregory Weldon will be presenting as well. I hope to share some of their thoughts as well as my takeaways in the coming days.
All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor.
The Shanghai Composite Index is an index of all stocks that trade on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The S&P Global Natural Resources Index includes 90 of the largest publicly-traded companies in natural resources and commodities businesses that meet specific investability requirements, offering investors diversified, liquid and investable equity exposure across 3 primary commodity-related sectors: Agribusiness, Energy, and Metals & Mining. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance in the global emerging markets. The S&P 500 Stock Index is a widely recognized capitalization-weighted index of 500 common stock prices in U.S. companies. M2 Money Supply is a broad measure of money supply that includes M1 in addition to all time-related deposits, savings deposits, and non-institutional money-market funds.
-
Share this Post
- May 11, 2012
- Chart of the Week: Where Global Industrial Production Is Coming From
Many have compared today’s economic recovery to the slow, stagnant growth Americans lived through in the 1970s. I argue there’s at least one significant difference: Four decades ago, the world couldn’t depend on emerging market growth like it can today.
Take a look at Macquarie Research’s chart comparing industrial production (IP) following the 1970s with the output after the downturn in late 2008. The output during the mid-1970s and today’s cycle looks very similar over the first two years. The decline experienced around the 31-month mark today also mirrors the drop of the 1970s.

However, in 2011, advanced economies fell quicker and steeper than the IP in the 1970s. For the developed markets, the U.S. and Japan have had to bear the extra weight to make up for the lack of the European Union’s output. After the earthquake in 2011, Japan’s IP fell to a low of 90 but quickly recovered. In the chart, you can see that the combined current cycle of advanced economies has remained pretty stagnant following its trough.
Emerging markets came to the global rescue, with “Asia powering global growth,” says Macquarie. Over the past year, the world IP has crept higher than the output during the 1970s. “The emerging world continues to gain share of industrial activity, and continues to grow at rapid rates to keep global growth rates close to a healthy 4 percent year over year rate,” says Macquarie.
Back in the 1970s, emerging markets such as China and Russia had no global footprint and were isolationists. China was just beginning to build its modern economy. The world population back then was 4 billion; today it’s 7 billion. As millions of people in emerging countries are expected to move to urban communities in the coming decade, their governments have been pursuing policies that emulate America and promote growth.
Also read: China—The Great Stabilizer
All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor.
-
Share this Post
- May 9, 2012
- Gold Takes It On the Chin…What’s Next?
There was a strong reaction yesterday to the elevated debt crisis in Europe, with commodities and equities being indiscriminately sold. Gold fell 3 percent this week, losing its safe haven status as the dollar grew stronger and the 10-year government note headed lower.
The markets generally overreact to negative news, however, investors should keep in mind gold’s normal monthly historical volatility. Throughout the past 20 years of monthly returns, the precious metal generally increased only 0.5 percent in May, and has historically declined in June and July.
Facts don’t thwart the short-term pain, yet as contrarian investor Baron Rothschild said, “the time to buy is when there’s blood in the streets.” Here are five reasons we believe today’s sell-off sets up a buying opportunity for gold:
- It is precisely the debt strangling the eurozone which will drive gold demand over the longer term. The side effect to the abundance of printing by central banks in the U.S., Europe, Japan and England is bloated balance sheets amounting to nearly $8 trillion. This is double the amount that it was only three and a half years ago.

- Several developed markets have negative real interest rates and these rates are anticipated to remain negative for years to come. Historically, when the inflationary rate is greater than the current short-term interest rate, gold prices rose.

- Emerging market central banks continued their gold buying spree in March. UBS Investment Research says that Mexico bought 16.8 tons, Russia bought 15.6 tons and Turkey added 11.5 tons. Additional small purchases were made by Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Belarus. We wrote a few months ago that central banks have begun accumulating gold reserves since the Federal Reserve cut interest rates in 2007, and HSBC Global Research expects this buying trend to continue for another five years.

- In March, China’s gold shipments grew to 62.9 tons, which is the third largest volume of gold in a decade from Hong Kong to the mainland, according to UBS. With ongoing rising demand, China may overtake India this year as the world’s largest gold buyer.
- India’s government abolished the excise duty on gold jewelry. This was one of the reasons for the jewelers’ strike, which drove gold imports to decrease 55 percent in India a few months back. Getting rid of the tax should encourage the restocking of gold and bring Indian gold buyers back to the market. UBS reported on May 9 that Indian buying on yesterday’s dip was nearly twice the average daily volume and the “strongest since April 17.”
Over the past decade, these Fear Trade and Love Trade drivers have spurred gold higher, even as the yellow metal experienced short-term corrections along the way. Only hindsight could show how these corrections set up buying opportunities.
All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor.
- It is precisely the debt strangling the eurozone which will drive gold demand over the longer term. The side effect to the abundance of printing by central banks in the U.S., Europe, Japan and England is bloated balance sheets amounting to nearly $8 trillion. This is double the amount that it was only three and a half years ago.
-
Share this Post
- May 7, 2012
- Best Performer This Year May Surprise Investors

Since the stock market’s gate opened at the beginning of 2012, emerging countries were off to a fast start. Stocks in Brazil, Colombia and India galloped to the lead, increasing more than 10 percent within the first few weeks of the year.
By the time the end of April came around, Colombia had sprinted to the lead, followed closely by Thailand and the Philippines. All increased more than 20 percent in the first four months of 2012.

However, rather than focusing on the leaders of the pack, spectators seemed to have directed their attention toward the S&P 500 Index, as it galloped to its best first-quarter gain since 1998.
The recovery in U.S. stocks is significant and helps restore confidence in equities. We’re pleased to see markets improving, especially following a rough finish in 2011. Yet there lingers a persistent negativity toward emerging markets growth and commodities that prevents many investors from jockeying their portfolios into a position for growth. Rather, they remain spectators on the sidelines, with equity fund outflows continuing.
In contrast, Eastern Europe exploded on the upside and far outpaced not only the U.S. market, but also Europe. The chart below shows investment results across three different markets. Since the beginning of the year through April 30, the iShares S&P Europe 350 ETF has trailed, while the SPDR S&P 500 ETF has placed second. Among these three investments, the Eastern European Fund (EUROX) has kept the lead for most of the quarter and took first place as of April 30.

You can see above that EUROX and the European market were climbing steadily since the beginning of the year, but by April, began to fall because of the eurozone’s debt grief and concerns over China.
Over the past four months, Russian stocks, which are heavily weighted in energy companies, have underperformed many emerging markets, increasing only about 6 percent. HSBC Global Research believes that the low valuations seem to be “pricing in a lot of political risk” surrounding the protests against Russia’s newly elected presidential candidate. Investors need to see the opposition movements against Vladimir Putin as very different from the Middle East discontent, says HSBC. The firm says Russia’s protests are “largely liberal” without “religious dimension” which suggest future reforms to reduce the political discontent are more likely.
HSBC also thinks that the government will try to improve the investment climate. Putin suggested in a recent speech that he would like to increase Russia’s rating in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business report. Currently, Russia ranks 120th; Putin would like to set a goal of 20th place.
What may be hurting investor sentiment toward Russia in the short term is the political strain that has recently surfaced between Russia and the U.S. and NATO involving missile defense installations in Europe. This is precisely the reason we believe investors need to hold actively managed investments with experts who understand the political situation to skillfully maneuver around emerging Europe.
China, the Workhorse of the Global Economy
While China did not win, place or show among major markets during the first few months of the year, its H shares gained nearly as much as the S&P 500. Yet, the negativity that I’ve frequently discussed continues, even though the country is the Clydesdale of our global economy.In the first quarter, China’s GDP growth was 8.1 percent, a likely trough for the year, according to a Merrill Lynch-Bank of America conference call recently. The firm listed several reasons that China will see an improved GDP over the next three quarters:
- Although spring made an early appearance in many parts of North America, this past winter in China was the coldest in 27 years. This extremely chilly weather slowed down economic activity.
- Credit growth has bottomed out and bank lending has been reaccelerating. BCA Research echoed this thought in its China Investment Strategy this week, saying there’s been a “sharp turnaround in bankers’ confidence in recent months, which is also being reflected in rising bank lending of late.”
Home developer price cuts and lower mortgage rates offered to first-time buyers have driven a significant recovery in home sales. In our recent webcast on China, Andy Rothman from CLSA made some excellent comments related to mortgages, agreeing with ML-BofA, saying that each month it was getting easier for new home buyers to get mortgages, and along with lower interest rates for mortgages, this was a clear sign of “the government’s process of easing up on the housing sector.”- With leadership transition close to conclusion, local infrastructure construction activity is poised to increase.
- As shown below, crude steel, steel products and cement output has shown initial signs of recovery in the recent month.

While China’s Government Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for April came in slightly below market consensus, the number remains above the three-month number for the fifth consecutive month since December 2011. We believe the government’s PMI is a far better indicator of overall manufacturing activity than the HSBC data because it takes into account domestic demand.

From the PMI’s inception in January 2005, the majority of the time the PMI is above the three-month average, Chinese and U.S. stocks, as well as copper and WTI crude oil, all see gains over the following three months. So far this year, each has proved true.
BCA Research says that the latest PMI substantiates that the “Chinese economy may be reaccelerating,” pointing to three trends: Monetary easing is working, external demand seems strong and may be accelerating, and the government has increased fiscal expenditures on social housing and infrastructure projects, which is supportive of ML-BofA’s view above.
The race in the stock market isn’t over until it’s over. While a top contender may ultimately win in the Run for the Roses, the assumed “long shot” might come from behind and race to first place. Rather than place all your money on the market you believe will win, place or show, we believe diversification among markets is the way to go.
Which countries are you betting on to top markets in 2012? Email us at editor@usfunds.com.
See Our Popular Periodic Table of Emerging Markets.
Total Annualized Returns as of 03/31/2012 Fund 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year Gross Expense Ratio Eastern European Fund -20.47% 24.40% -6.79% 14.47% 1.98% SPDR S&P 500 ETF 8.36% 23.22% 1.96% 4.03% 0.10% iShares S&P Europe 350 ETF -7.80% 16.79% -4.21% 5.02% 0.60% Expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectus. Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Results reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance does not include the effect of any direct fees described in the fund’s prospectus (e.g., short-term trading fees of 2.00%) which, if applicable, would lower your total returns. Performance quoted for periods of one year or less is cumulative and not annualized. Obtain performance data current to the most recent month-end at www.usfunds.com or 1-800-US-FUNDS.
Please consider carefully a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. For this and other important information, obtain a fund prospectus by visiting www.usfunds.com or by calling 1-800-US-FUNDS (1-800-873-8637). Read it carefully before investing. Distributed by U.S. Global Brokerage, Inc.
For investment objective and risks regarding the Eastern European Fund, the SPDR S&P and the S&P Europe 350 ETFs, click here to see additional disclosures.
-
Share this Post
- May 4, 2012
- Apple is a Want—Global Resources are Needs
Last week, U.S. Global’s Tadas Misiunas and I spent some time with financial advisors from Florida, providing an update on natural resources investments. Many asked why global resources were significantly lagging the overall S&P 500 Index. Over the past year, there’s been an extreme disparity between the sector and the overall market: As of March 31, 2012, the Morgan Stanley Commodity Related Equity Index had a one-year return of 15 percent while the S&P 500 Index gained more than 8 percent over the same period.
Here’s a different way of showing how energy stocks have lagged. The chart below shows the 12-month rolling return percentage change of the S&P 500 Energy Index. Over the past 12 months, energy stocks have declined so dramatically that it now registers a “one-sigma event” in standard deviation terms. Historically, this has occurred only 18.5 percent of the time in the past 10 years. There were only two episodes when performance was worse on a one-year rolling basis: during the 2002–2003 period and during the global financial crisis in 2008-2009 when the U.S. was in a recession.

I continue to be amazed at the underperformance in natural resources stocks when you look at certain equities in the S&P 500. The most dramatic example is Apple. Over the past decade, its stock price has climbed substantially. I recently discussed a Financial Times article that showed a potential investment of $399 in Apple shares in November 2001 would have been worth $26,000 in March 2012.
Today, Apple’s market capitalization has grown to around $550 billion, which is higher than the market cap of all of the utilities companies in the S&P 500 and higher than all of the S&P 500 materials companies.
There’s no doubt Apple has quality products and is a great company—our funds have benefited from holding shares. Apple’s products are quickly becoming as common as a toaster, with a survey by CNBC finding that half of all U.S. households own at least one Apple device! If a household has children, that number jumps to 60 percent.
However, investors seem to be overlooking the fact that Apple’s products are “wants,” not “needs.” Millions of consumers want an iPad and many want a computer, yet, every single person in the world needs global resources. We need companies to grow our food; we need oil, natural gas and coal to fuel our cities. We need to drive to work and school each day, and we need to keep our house warm in the winter and cool in the summer. And so do the other 7 billion people on the planet.

To outperform the S&P 500 over the long term, we believe investors should overweight their portfolio to the global products and services that people need, not want. Currently, energy and materials make up only about 15 percent of the S&P 500, which seems insignificant compared to the tremendous needs from not only the developed markets, but the growing emerging countries.
With the S&P 500 Energy Index in oversold territory, today offers a great buying opportunity to add a natural resources investment like the Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) to your portfolio.
Related posts:
- The Apple Doesn’t Fall Far From the Global Resources Tree
- A Great Reason to be Investing
- Weighing the Evidence of Oil and Gold Stocks
Please consider carefully a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. For this and other important information, obtain a fund prospectus by visiting www.usfunds.com or by calling 1-800-US-FUNDS (1-800-873-8637). Read it carefully before investing. Distributed by U.S. Global Brokerage, Inc.
Foreign and emerging market investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and less public disclosure, as well as economic and political risk. Because the Global Resources Fund concentrates its investments in a specific industry, the fund may be subject to greater risks and fluctuations than a portfolio representing a broader range of industries.
The S&P 500 Stock Index is a widely recognized capitalization-weighted index of 500 common stock prices in U.S. companies. The S&P 500 Energy Index is a capitalization-weighted index that tracks the companies in the energy sector as a subset of the S&P 500. The Morgan Stanley Commodity Related Index (CRX) is an equal-dollar weighted index of 20 stocks involved in commodity related industries such as energy, non-ferrous metals, agriculture, and forest products. Standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion of a set of data from its mean. The more spread apart the data, the higher the deviation. Standard deviation is also known as historical volatility.
All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor. Holdings in the Global Resources Fund as a percentage of net assets as of 3/31/12: Apple, 0.00%.
-
Share this Post


